ISO/TR 19169 maps and describes the differences between GDF (ISO 20524 series), from ISO/TC 204, and conceptual models from the ISO 19100 family, from ISO/TC 211, and suggests ways to harmonize and resolve conflicting issues in GDF and ISO/TC 211.
ISO/TR 19169 on gap-analysis: mapping and describing the differences between the current GDF and ISO/TC 211 conceptual models to suggest ways harmonize and resolve conflicting issues in GDF and ISO/TC 211 is useful for:
With the emergence of increasingly connected and automated road vehicles, there is a need to share geospatial information between the vehicle’s navigational and contextual awareness systems and the mapping and road authorities (the road-side actors).
GDF continues to be developed to adapt to the requirements of road vehicle automation, as well as wider domains of application, such as public transport, geospatial and navigation data. A lack of alignment between GDF key concepts and those of ISO/TC211 standards reduces the collective efficacy of the combined standards, increases the complexity of utilizing standards-conformant data in an efficient manner and increases the risk and threats arising from ineffective conversions. ISO/TR 19169 aims to identify the gaps between the two concepts and suggest ways to harmonize and resolve conflicting issues in GDF and ISO/TC 211.
Within ISO/TR 19169, comparative analysis and recommendations are provided. At a broad level, the analysis and recommendations suggest modifications to GDF to make an ISO 19100 family-based application schema in order to:
ISO/TR 19169